On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:19:28 +0000 Peter Lewis <ple...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > On Sunday 12 December 2010 03:21:30 Xyne wrote: > > The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section > > of the TU bylaws: > > > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendment&oldid=124557 > > > > The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. > > Briefly, these include: > > * enabling a vote to pass in the absence of quorum when more than > > 50% of active TUs have voted YES > > * enabling a vote to fail in the absence of quorum when 50% or more > > of active TUs have voted NO > > * clarifying the text to eliminate ambiguities > > > > Please see Kaiting's "[aur-general]Amendment" thread and Loui's > > "[aur-general][PATCH]tu-bylaws: Amend Standard Voting Procedure" > > thread for more details. > > > > This message marks the beginning of the 5-day discussion period > > before the amendment is put to a vote. > > Are we voting on this then?
I guess we should, let's vote for another one to agree before starting one and do a mistake with that ;-) -- Jabber: atsut...@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
