Excerpts from Philipp Gesang's message of 2011-01-14 09:21:57 +0100: > Hello archers, > > for my own use I made a pkgbuild of luaGRAPH[1] and I’d like to > share it via aur. As this will be my first contribution I guess > it can’t hurt to have it reviewed here by more experienced users > before submitting. > > Thanks for your opinion, Philipp > > > [1] http://luagraph.luaforge.net/ > http://luaforge.net/projects/luagraph/ > > # Maintainer: Philipp Gesang <megas dot kapaneus at gmail dot com> > pkgname=luagraph > pkgver=1.0.4 > pkgrel=1 > pkgdesc="LuaGRAPH is a binary module to create, manipulate, layout and render > graphs using the Lua programming language." > arch=("any") > url="http://luaforge.net/projects/${pkgname}" > license=("MIT") > depends=("lua" "graphviz") > source=("http://luaforge.net/frs/download.php/4528/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz" > "LICENSE") > md5sums=("f2f71bcbabf243792e230665b1403f58" > "814f32bd3d115e90f777e7baf714338d") > > build() { > cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}" || return 1 > make > install -Dm0755 graph/core.so "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/lua/5.1/graph/core.so" > || return 1 > install -Dm0644 graph.lua "${pkgdir}/usr/lib/lua/5.1/graph.lua" > || return 1 > install -Dm0644 LICENSE "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}/LICENSE" > || return 1 > }
Is there a reason to distribute it as a binary? Compiling from source is the preferred way. Link to source tarballs: http://luaforge.net/frs/?group_id=237&release_id=1626 Also, binary packages should be postfixed with -bin. Regards, Philipp