2011/2/7 Cédric Girard <girard.ced...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Ray Rashif <sc...@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> Err..it is as relaxed as the wiki. I don't see why any question about >> ownership should arise. If someone wants to claim ownership and not be >> willing to share then so be it (don't even upload to AUR then). She >> will have a bad reputation, not our problem. >> > > You can't say that. If someone decide to claim ownership to the PKGBUILD he > wrote and nothing has been done to clear the ownership issue before, the > reputation of this guy would be the last thing to worry about for Arch > Linux. > > Considering the wiki, it is clearly stated as being under the GNU Free > Documentation License 1.2.
Sorry, bad comparison, then. I'm not really sure what to compare it with. We've never had to talk about things like this before (so probably the time has come you would say). First of all, we've never had people claiming "rights" to PKGBUILDs.
