On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 14:20, Ray Rashif <sc...@archlinux.org> wrote: > 2011/2/7 Cédric Girard <girard.ced...@gmail.com>: >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Ray Rashif <sc...@archlinux.org> wrote: >> >>> Err..it is as relaxed as the wiki. I don't see why any question about >>> ownership should arise. If someone wants to claim ownership and not be >>> willing to share then so be it (don't even upload to AUR then). She >>> will have a bad reputation, not our problem. >>> >> >> You can't say that. If someone decide to claim ownership to the PKGBUILD he >> wrote and nothing has been done to clear the ownership issue before, the >> reputation of this guy would be the last thing to worry about for Arch >> Linux. >> >> Considering the wiki, it is clearly stated as being under the GNU Free >> Documentation License 1.2. > > Sorry, bad comparison, then. I'm not really sure what to compare it > with. We've never had to talk about things like this before (so > probably the time has come you would say). First of all, we've never > had people claiming "rights" to PKGBUILDs.
See my gcc-svn PKGBUILD: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24849 Nobody likes it anyway, so who cares! :-)