2011/5/16 Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkov...@gmail.com>: > > I removed [4] as I see you already take over the [1].
For some time now I'm the maintainer of pcsx2, pcsx2-svn-bin and pcsx2-svn. My intention is to have in AUR only a binary as source (pcsx2 or pcsx2-bin) and another with SVN as source. > However I'm not > sure whether pcsx2-bin should be removed, the maintainer seems to be > active. Yeah, sort of. At least he didn't reply my email for around 10 days. I hope he reply yours, but case he doesn't, I'm in for adopting. >If there is no source package I personally prefer the pcsx2 > name (without the -bin suffix). Agree with you. > I CCed this email to matthewbauer, so he could share his opinion on this > topic. > > Lukas > Cheers, -- Rafael