On 19 June 2011 21:09, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the solution is to be *very* consistent with packages names > whatever the situation of the python3 version is right now. > In other words: pick a guideline and stick to it. If > python2-X/python-X is the way to go, no matter there is a python3 > package or not, use this convention...
Correct. However, with a previous discussion [1] and a bug report [2] lingering I think most of us are hesitant to make a move. Maybe we're just hoping for someone to step up with a mighty roar and set the record straight. [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-April/019958.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23139 -- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10