* Uli Armbruster <uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com> [22.06.2011 13:33]: > * Heiko Baums <li...@baums-on-web.de> [22.06.2011 13:22]: > > Am Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:18:04 +0200 > > schrieb Uli Armbruster <uli.armbrus...@googlemail.com>: > > > > > Here's the link https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49992 > > > I reuploaded under the name mkvmerge-gui because the name fits better > > > (I also added mmg and mkvtoolnix to the description, so it can be > > > found as good as possible) > > > > > > And here's the link to mkvtoolnix-nogui > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41546 This isn't needed > > > anymore, because repo's mkvtoolnix removed the mkvmerge-gui mmg. A > > > package called eunektes requires this version, but I informed the > > > maintainer in the comment section to adjust the dependency. > > > > > > Merci beaucoup > > > > Isn't it better to call the packages mkvmerge-gtk and mkvmerge-cli? > > It's the usual naming convention in the repos and in AUR. > > > > Heiko > > Well, I could do that too, you're right. In my opinion *-gui is fine, because > .. well it IS the gui of mkvmerge ;) And most importantly, I named it that > way, because the real name of mmg is "mkvmerge GUI", so I had the choice > between "mkvmergegui" or "mkvmerge-gui". I chose the latter, because it looks > better ;) > > But honestly, I don't care, if it's called *-gui or *-gtk. If it's really > convention (I haven't found this anywhere after a quick search like in > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards#Package_Naming) > or if TUs thing *-gtk is better, I'll be happy to reupload it with that name.
Just remembered, this package is still there. Could anyone please delete it? Or make me TU for a day and I'll do it myself ;) (kidding!) Regards Army
