On 11/19/2011 06:22 AM, Heiko Baums wrote: > Am Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:17:10 +0100 > schrieb Sven-Hendrik Haase <s...@lutzhaase.com>: > >> A better solution is likely to package irrlicht straight from svn but >> I'm not sure I feel comfortable with that. >> >> It would at least need to conflict. > This is what upstream of supertuxkart has written: > "note that at this time SuperTuxKart uses irrlicht trunk, so you may > need to build and install irrlicht from their SVN. We hope irrlicht 1.8 > will be released soon and then distributions can start including it in > their repositories" > > http://supertuxkart.sourceforge.net/Installation > > And here is a thread in the forums of irrlicht upstream about that: > http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=37207&start=210 > > To the question "When is 1.8 due to get out ?" someone replied among > others: "You can get the SVN right now, conveniently through Irrlicht > Nightly Builds." > > So maybe you should indeed still hold off updating both. I mean > supertuxkart 0.7 works and there are -svn packages in AUR if someone > needs them. I just didn't know about the dependency issues. > > Heiko Alright then. In general, if an Arch package isn't updated, there usually is a good reason.
-- Sven-Hendrik