I maintain qastools and I do not totally agree to this merge. Qasmixer can be built singularly from the qastools source using the -DBUILD_LIST=qasmixer cmake flag (see attachment).
Also not always merging comments is a good idea, in this case they make no sense and may be misunderstood referring to qastools. If you agree, I'll re-upload the attached build script to the AUR so a comments reversion can be operated (qastools -> qasmixer). Next time it would be better wait for some other opinions when the packages to be merged do not share the same maintainer. Cheers On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:01:07 +0200 Massimiliano Torromeo <massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Spyros Stathopoulos > <foucault.onl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello everyone! The package I was maintaining "qasmixer" > > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48676) has been superseded by a > > collection of tools that include the one I was maintaining (qastools > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54793). Therefore I would like to > > ask > > for qasmixer to be removed since the standalone sources for qasmixer have > > been > > removed from upstream. > > > > Thanks! > > Spyros > > qasmixer has been merged into qastools. > > Thanks
PKGBUILD
Description: Binary data
qasmixer.install
Description: Binary data
pgp3ZkHhTVlWe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
