On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:46:03 +0200 Gaetan Bisson <bis...@archlinux.org> wrote:
> [2012-04-26 21:26:19 +0200] speps: > > So, from the beginning of my Internet experience, I never referenced to > > myself through my real name/life, but using a nickname, a digital identity. > > Also, your IP address is in the headers. Not a problem :) > Anyhow, there is no anonymity debate: different master key holders > verify different aspects of who you claim to be, and that is all there > is to it. For instance, they may verify your email address by asking you > to reply to encrypted messages, or verify your website by asking you to > upload your public key there. Verifying your identity is another element > that builds up confidence and reputation, even when it is not directly > related to your packaging activities. The point being that we get a > notion of trust a little stronger than "I never saw bad packages coming > that way." Hi and thanks for sharing your opinions on the topic. If I didn't get it wrong, this means real name is not mandatory, but an additional point that may enforce trust for someone while it confirms relevant informations. > Speaking of email addresses, could you show us that you own > dreamspep...@yahoo.it since it is what you used on the AUR? Here I am > > As you can see I sign mails with my GPG Key > > Could you publish that key somewhere? Sure, it is already published on the pgp.mit.edu key server http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xCF7037A4F27FB7DA GPG-Key: 0xF27FB7DA Key fingerprint: 8840 BD07 FC24 CB7C E394 A07C CF70 37A4 F27F B7DA > Cheers. Regards - speps -
pgp40RfVSdfTy.pgp
Description: PGP signature