> It seems that none cares after all, huh? > But I still do want to do it as right as it can possibly be, mostly > because > I now need flake8 for both python 2 and 3. > So if nobody complains, I'll go with my initial thought (see my previous > post here) sometime near the end of the week. > > On 29 November 2012 07:09, Karol Wo¼niak <wozni...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK, I'm back for a moment, so, as a maintainer of flake8 package, I >> guess >> I should write something here >> (and hope gmail won't mess the nesting. I still don't know how it works >> here...). >> >> Coming to think about it, there IS a library in flake8. I mean, most >> people will just run the exec and be fine, but if you really need, you >> can >> import things from flake8 package and run it from inside the interpreter >> (which is what the exec does, anyway). >> That said, I think the closest follow up for us are python(2)-pip >> packages >> from [extra]. So, while I was a bit against it, I now think the best >> thing >> we can do is to pick up the python(2)-* convention. >> >> That still leaves one issue, though. To allow the packages to coexist, >> we >> should rename python2 exec to "flake82". Maybe it's just me, but it >> looks >> weird. And besides that, I don't know how other apps (e.g. syntax >> checking >> plugins for editors) using flake8 will behave. Syntastic has a way to >> change the exec used for checking, but I don't know about the others. >> >> >> Xyne wrote: >> >> >While we're on the subject, can someone please explain to me again why >> we >> use >> >"python-" and not "python3-" for Python 3 libraries? >> >> This way, if py4 ever comes out, this will make us a new bunch of mess >> and >> a whole lot of work to do again. Isn't that great? >> >> -- >> Karol "Kenji Takahashi" Wo¼niak <http://kenji.sx> >> > > > > -- > Pozdrawiam, > Karol Wo¼niak > > Karol, naming is more an arch issue then an aur/community one. Maybe post this on arch-dev-public ?
LW
