On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 18:01 -0600, Doug Newgard wrote: > ---------------------------------------- > > From: aluc...@gmail.com > > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > > Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:34:54 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Delete/Merge Requests > > > > On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 22:25 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > ... > > > * efl-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efl-svn/ to be deleted > > > * efl-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efl-git/ > > > > > > > All merged. > > Doug: please send a delete request for efl-svn when you feel most users > > have switched. > > I plan on it. I'll actually have 28 packages to merge once the switch is > complete. I'm a bit OCD and wouldn't just leave them, I went through most > of the Enlightenment packages in the AUR already and cleaned up a bunch > of stuff. > > > > * geneet-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geneet-svn/ enlightenment > > > has moved to git, PKGBUILD hs no description > > > * geneet-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/geneet-git/ > > > > > > > svn still exists, git package does not point to the official > > enlightenment git repos, is orphaned and has no description. I would > > delete the git for now. What do others think? > > That git repo is Profusion's, who does a lot of work on Enlightenment. > From what I can tell, geneet was developed there, then moved into > Enlightenment's official svn repo. I would say that geneet-svn is the current > official version. You can delete geneet-git, but it'll end up being recreated > when they switch that program to the new git repo, so it doesn't really > matter.
Thanks Doug, I'll delete geneet-git for now then. -- Maxime
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part