Op dinsdag 19 februari 2013 19:18:38 schreef Rudy Matela:
> Hello,
> 
> Hydra was outdated, so I've stepped in as maintainer of hydra [1].
> 
> Turns out there is another package (thc-hydra [2]) which was created
> to be an updated version of hydra while the last maintainer was not
> 
> working on it, quoting from the first comment on it:
> > "This is an updated version of the original package [1]
> > 
> > I made this package because the original one was flagged as
> > outdatted for more than 1 month and no one recived response from
> > the submitter/maintainer."
> Since it does not apply anymore I think thc-hydra [2] should be
> deleted. It is interesting to note: thc-hydra is also outdated.
> 
> Regards,
> Rudy
> 
> [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hydra/
> [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thc-hydra/
> 
> 
> PS: This is related to the orphan request I did minutes ago:
> 
> Orphan request: hydra

Still I think it would be polite to inform the current maintainer of
thc-hydra about this.

Could you inform him/her and we'll follow the normal orphan rules of 
timing. 2 weeks no response and we'll do it anyway.

thx
-- 
Ike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to