On 24 March 2013 04:42, Xyne <x...@archlinux.ca> wrote: > If a TU has an objection that he cannot support publicly then something is > very > wrong. The application process should not be some mysterious black box of > negative, baseless opinions. If a TU would rather keep an objection to himself > than risk offending the candidate by expressing it then either the objection > itself is without merit or the TU is more concerned about his own popularity > than the quality of the distribution.
I completely agree with you. But as we have just seen, it doesn't always work like that. In such case, a black box which can tell you some of the reasons why people voted "No" is an improvement over knowing absolutely nothing.