On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Xorg <xorgbrea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 05/07/2013 23:01, Maxime GAUDUIN a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia <
>> palop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On vie, 5 de jul 2013 a las 1:34 PM, Maxime GAUDUIN <aluc...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:22 PM, SJ_UnderWater <webmaster0...@rcn.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia <
>>>>
>>>>> palop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > 2013/7/3 Xorg <xorgbrea...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > >
>>>>>
>>>>> I will disown libkqueue in 2 weeks time provided there is no answer
>>>> from
>>>> niQo, then you can adopt it and we will proceed with the merge.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Maxime
>>>>
>>>> Just a precision, the OP is Xorg. The ball is in his field. :-) (I
>>>> have
>>>>
>>> no practical use for libkqueue myself, consider me last-resort adopter).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Don't worry, I was replying to SJ_UnderWater :P
>>
>> Sorry to answer now. Yes, I have made this request, because I think
> (like Lukas) libkqueue0 is a duplicate package (from libkqueue, which is
> flagged out-of-date).
> I use libkqueue only as /darling-git/'s dependency. So I think
> SJ_UnderWater's package is the best package for libkqueue. Then, I read
> you, and I conclude the best solution is that niQo orphans his package,
> SJ_UnderWater adopts it and sends a new request to delete libkqueue0.
>
> About libkqueue-svn, OK, I didn't know svn still exist. SJ_UnderWater, do
> you want to adopt it ? I'm not interested by, but I can adopt it in
> last-resort.
>
> Thanks.
> X0rg.
>
It seems libkqueue{,-svn} was updated by niQo, but he didn't bother
replying here. Oh well, merging libkqueue0 into libkqueue.
--
Maxime
