Xyne wrote: >Lukas Fleischer wrote: > >>> The clause should probably also specify that removal votes take precedence >>> over >>> any other pending votes except removal votes. >> >>What does this mean in practice? :) > >Let's say that the discussion period for a TU application begins and the vote >is scheduled to start on Monday. A motion is made for the removal of a TU >during this period and the vote should normally start on Tuesday. I think the >application vote should be suspended until the removal vote is finished. It >affects quorum and the outcome of the vote. > >If two removal votes are scheduled then they occur in the usual order.
>I think that's it. I have attached up updated version of my previous >submission. Take a look and let me know what you think. > That version does not include any mention of removal votes preceding other votes.
