On 9 August 2013 19:29, Xyne <x...@archlinux.ca> wrote: > ... > * remove distinction between "active" and "inactive" TUs
So now what happens when so-called active or inactive TUs do not vote and prevent quorum from being established? No action is taken? I see these changes cover disappearing TUs, but not non-participating TUs. I may also just be missing something. > ... > * various changes to correct or improve English throughout the document While you're at it: > ... > mailing list] (aur-general). The proposal must also be worded unambiguously, > and such that a YES or NO answer may be given. -and such that +such that > ... > 2. quorum was established and the number of NO votes is greater than or equal > to the number of YES votes -quorum was established +quorum has been established > ... > +Quorums were established to ensure that all matters decided by vote are > +representative of the TU group. All TUs are expected to participate in all The terms "quorum" and "established" are already used in the document with a different meaning, so different wording could be used here, e.g.: +Quorums ensure that matters decided by vote are +representative of the voters as a group. All TUs are expected to participate in all > +A motion must be made by at least two TUs for the removal of a > +TU. The motion must be sent to -removal of a +removal of another > https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general], and > contain a detailed and valid reason that the TU in question should be > removed. -that the +why the > +OR who has not voted in a consecutive series of voting periods, the starting How many "consecutive series"? > +is followed by a discussion period of three days, a quorum of 66%, and a > voting -three days +3 days -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
