On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman <sc...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 12 January 2014 23:42, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazew...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Karol Blazewicz >> <karol.blazew...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Lukas Jirkovsky <l.jirkov...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman <sc...@archlinux.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Since there was no 'rstudio' at the time that user uploaded this one, >>>>> there is no infringement of any rule or guideline per se. Just tell >>>>> them to upload an 'r-studio' to mitigate the confusion that resulted >>>>> from it. I don't think there is any need to merge unless there were >>>>> relevant comments. It is up to the maintainer to update the PKGBUILD >>>>> with the suggested changes. >>>> >>>> The question is whether the maintainer is still active at all. Hist >>>> last action is 2012-08-27 and he has only two packages, both over the >>>> year old with one being flagged out of date since February. >>>> >>>> Lukas >>> >>> e-mail sent. >>> If he doesn't respond in two weeks, maybe a TU can reupload and disown >>> it, or remove it from the AUR altogether, whichever is deemed the >>> correct action. >> >> The maintainer has taken no action and didn't respond to my e-mail. > > Did your e-mail actually get through to that address? It's being > returned here, and if we'd known this before we could've just gone > ahead and done what we wanted. An non-existent e-mail address is close > to meaning a non-existent user. > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
It wasn't returned. I e-mailed him and got no response, neither automated nor personal, no error, nothing.