On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Daniel Landau <daniel.lan...@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 2014-02-13 04:27, Florian Bruhin wrote: > >> I'm the current maintainer of the pebble-sdk-beta[1] package. >> > > I don't have comments on your actual questions but I do have one of my own: > > [2] claims a license of GPLv3 and [1] claims MIT. I can't find license > information in the SDK tar balls but I do find binaries without > corresponding sources. What's the deal here? > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pebble-sdk-beta/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pebble-sdk/ >> > > Daniel Landau > I went as far as looking in the github repository and I'm guessing the sdk-beta assumed MIT based on this[1] where it says all examples are released under MIT License. [1]https://github.com/pebble/pebble-sdk-examples Taylor Lookabaugh