The official distribution is the RPM/DEB/binary distribution. The ruby-vagrant package is different - I don't believe it is based on vagrant-installers. If we wanted to not use the RPMs (which are very self-contained) but still have a low-maintenance way of packaging this, we could start here: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant-installers
Ido On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomo...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ido Rosen <i...@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful > tool > > for ArchLinux users. I am happy to continue maintaining it in AUR; > > however, for the good of the community, it would be great if one of you > TUs > > could move vagrant into [community] as soon as possible so it could get > > wider exposure. It currently has ~147 votes. Releases are infrequent, > so > > it has been very easy to maintain overall. > > > > AUR package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vagrant/ > > Upstream distribution website: http://www.vagrantup.com/ > > > > Also, if you'd like to make changes to the PKGBUILD in AUR, you can > submit > > a pull request on GitHub: https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux (under > > the aur/vagrant directory). > > I see that it uses *.rpm file as a source. Does this project have source > repo? > > Is ruby-vagrant aur package (built from sources) the same as your package? >