On 07/03/2014 17:26, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> -1 for ceph, I experienced data loss last time I tried it on a small
> test-cluster. (Reported a bug. It's probably fixed now, but I still
> don't trust it).
> 

I support adding Ceph. There are professional appliances based on Ceph.
We have a cluster running (in my company) since one year and we didn't
have lost any data.

Here, using it in production is not the point. Having Ceph in community
would help to test and use remote cluster from Arch. So, +1.

Cheers,

-- 
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42
GPG: 0x2072D77A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to