On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:54:05 James Bulmer wrote: > Hi. > > Earlier today I put a request in to disown python2-routes, I now > need python2-repoze-lru which is a dependency of python2-routes. It had the > same owner and is the same situation of not being updated in the last 2 > years. > > Thanks again > -- James
Actually I prefer "python2-repoze.lru" as the naming scheme, since it follows upstream, and most repoze packages in the AUR are named in this way (python2- repoze-lru being the only exception). So I'll suggest to merge python2-repoze-lru into python2-repoze.lru, and disown python2-repoze.lru which didn't update for even longer, and the maintainer has half of his packages out-of-date. What do you think? Regards, Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
