Ahh of course. (I'm new to developing for the public so wasn't quite sure.) I'll take your suggestion and contact the devs even though I have my doubts.
Cheers for the clarification. On 28/03/2014, LoneVVolf <lonew...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 27-03-14 10:24, David Phillips wrote: >> Hi all, I adopted https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq/ a while >> ago to nurture it back into health after seeing that it was trying to >> use outdated files in /proc/ amongst other fatal bugs. The owners >> haven't updated their sourceforge in a while (five years), so decided >> to have a hack at rewriting it myself to work with modern >> installations. That's enough background, it's mostly working now, but >> the PKGBUILD is pointing to my source code. >> >> Question: Should I have the aur package renamed to account for the >> fact it's not using the 'true', 'official' sources even though those >> haven't worked for years? >> >> Cheers for your opinions. > > David, it does sound like you forked trayfreq . > If that's correct, you should give your project another name and then > the aur package would ofcourse also need to change. > > There may be an alternative however : > contact dzs6w3 & starfall87 ,the people that created trayfreq, and team > up with them ? > > You can contact them through their sourceforge profile pages : > http://sourceforge.net/u/dzs6w3/profile/ > http://sourceforge.net/u/starfall87/profile/ > > Lone_Wolf > -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B