On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 09:56:18, Attila Bukor wrote: > On 07/08/2014 06:27 PM, Steven Honeyman wrote: > > The trouble is there are too many people that don't (or can't) think > > about *why* something might not be working. It's often the users' > > fault :) > > > > Suppose someone sets ld.gold as their default linker "because the > > internet told them it was better"... and then tries to compile > > imagemagick... > > > > > > Steven. > > What if it would be a vote-like structure and one reporter wouldn't be > enough to flag it as not working? >
Dan suggested something similar some time ago [1] and I quite like that idea. One "Mark package broken" button and an option to sort package search results by the number of users that marked a package. > r1pp3rj4ck > > > [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2011-June/001698.html