AFAIK time was given to allocate the packages to authors. I think it's OK to proceed.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 17:26 ShadowKyogre <[email protected]> wrote: > These were the original uploaded PKGBUILDs, still referencing to a stale > source: > 1. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/mse-mtg/ > 2. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/mse-mtg-phyrexian/ > > These were the uploads with the new content re-hosting, but the > maintainer hasn't contacted me back about wanting to maintain the other > MtG templates that're floating around (there's a few more): > 1. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/magicseteditor-mtg/ > 2. https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/magicseteditor-mtg-base/ > > I was planning to wait until August to make a decision, but, like the > title says, I'm not sure whether I should just submit updated packages > on the AUR4 that point to the same sources as magicseteditor-mtg, wait > for elegua to re-upload the packages for magicseteditor-mtg*, or upload > the second set of links and add elegua as a contributor to make sure he > still has write rights. I originally orphaned the first two links > because I was thinking that elegua might be interested in merging it > into the packages he uploaded so there aren't duplicate packages > floating around. >
