I agree with gt. Not meaning to bike shed further, but if we had a 'not constructive' or 'destructive' flag, and have the comment appear grayed out and flagged for moderation after n flags, this would be a more sane implementation of 'voting' on comments.
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR Muflone
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our A... Andrejs Mivreņiks
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in o... Lukas Fleischer
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue ... Ido Rosen
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam is... Johannes Löthberg
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a sp... Oon-Ee Ng
- Re: [aur-general] We've got ... Tai-Lin Chu
- Re: [aur-general] We've got ... Prakhar Singh
- Re: [aur-general] We've got ... Giancarlo Razzolini
- Re: [aur-general] We've got ... gt
- Re: [aur-general] We've got ... David Phillips
- Re: [aur-general] We've got ... David Phillips
- Re: [aur-general] We've got ... Sascha Shaw
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our AUR Daniel Micay
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in our A... Lukas Fleischer
- Re: [aur-general] We've got a spam issue in o... Giancarlo Razzolini