On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Javier Vasquez <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Karol Blazewicz > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Javier Vasquez >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in >>> AUR offers something the new pandoc in community doesn't. >> >> Try to find out what compile options does the upstream -bin one use or >> ask on pandoc mailing list. BTW, http://pandoc.org/installing.html >> links to a nonexistent AUR package instead to the brand new pandoc >> package from the repos. > > It sounds the old AUR package "haskell-pandoc" pointed by > "http://pandoc.org/installing.html";, which is no longer available, is > the same new community "pandoc" package. How complete or incomplete > is that pandoc package I wouldn't know. Installing from source uses > "cabal", whereas the PKGBUILD for pandoc uses "runhaskell" directly > with several options. > > I'm not a haskell guy, so I can't tell, but it seems that pandoc plus > other community pandoc packages, might be equivalent to the pandoc-bin > in AUR... > > I'll just try it out. > > Thanks all, > > -- > Javier
Oh well, dependencies, :-) pandoc-bin doesn't require a bunch of haskell packages, while pandoc (pandoc-haskell) does. So I'll stick with pandoc-bin, :-) Thanks to all again, -- Javier
