On 12/11/2015 09:45, Stefan Husmann wrote: > MIT and other BSD like license flavours _are_ custom licenses. >
Indeed, they are. I chose poor wording to express myself, so here is a quote from the PKGBUILD wiki page that shows what I wanted to say: > For the sake of the license array, it is treated as a common license (license=('BSD'), license=('MIT'), license=('ZLIB') and license=('Python')), but technically each one is a custom license, because each one has its own copyright line. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#license Maybe we should also quote the next line for more clarity for the original poster: > Any packages licensed under these four should have its own unique license stored in /usr/share/licenses/pkgname. And an example: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/lpeg Regards, -- Rodolphe Breard https://rodolphe.breard.tf/ PGP 6C41C1F2