On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:42 AM, DJ Lucas <d...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > No. That has historically been the name. Anyone who is already familiar > with flash on Liunx is likely to use "pepper" as a search term. > Yes, but that's a non-issue because the default is to search by "Name, Description". Same with (Oracle) JDK.
Coincidentally, searching for "chromium-pepper-flash" (provides) using a > keyword search in AUR Web does not give any results. I would have suggested > requesting another provides as a compromise, but it seems that doesn't work > as expected. Should it? I thought this was fixed way back in 4.1.0?: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43157 Regression? Det
