On 04/19/17 at 08:01pm, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2017-04-19 19:55, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > > I just wanted to clear this up with the other TUs: Is it ok for [community] > > packages to have optional deps on AUR packages or not? > > > > I used to loudly oppose that, but now I think it's fine as long as the > description states that given optdep is in AUR.
I disagree, optdeps from the AUR would seem to be supported except that they are not. So it would be a lot better to just move those packages to [community], which is faster and easier for users. > I guess arch-dev-public is better place for this discussion. Yes P.S. I noticed that for ansible you already started mentioning the AUR in optdeps. Why start implementing it before we actually came to a solution?! -- Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
