On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:29 -0500, Santiago Torres-Arias via aur-general wrote: > ## Issues > * Existing Trusted Users are not followed closely in their actions, and the > quality of some packages for instance is more than questionable. Do you have several example to show? > * New applications are not carefully reviewed, and a several TUs seem > to just vote “Yes” by default. From which facts are this assumption is built from? > * There is a general feeling of decreasing/not high enough quality in the > packages provided in the community/ repository. Idem. What elements do you have to support this feeling ? > * The implication of some TUs in the distribution is very limited outside of > packaging. What's wrong with that? Regards,
Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
