On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 11:30 +0200, Ike Devolder via aur-general wrote: > On 12/08/2019 20:18, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > @Ike, > > > > I'm curious what made you choose to call it "kodi-bin" instead of what > > seems to me like the more descriptive and accurate "kodi-x11". Perhaps > > it might make sense to change the pkgname? > > kodi-bin was chosen to have kodi-x11 as the default, if all "bin" > packages provide kodi-bin and kodi depends on "kodi-bin", by default > there would be kodi-gdbm installed, which most people can't actually What do you think about kodi-default-x11? Same hack, but looks prettier ☺
> use. So by having kodi-bin as an actual package which holds kodi-x11 > that is still most used, users of kodi-wayland or kodi-gdbm can install > those alongside or alone to suit there needs. >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
