On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 09:03:26PM +0200, alad via aur-general wrote: > On 14/10/2020 17:16, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > > Hi Bruno, > > Top-posting, do you know what it means? > > Do not do this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting > > But do this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style > or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting > > Again https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Code_of_conduct#Top_posting > > Don't expect anyone to take you seriously if you keep doing this even after > being asked not to, repeatedly. > > Alad > > > > > Thanks a lot for confirming that I didn't receive Orphaning > > email! > > > > I did receive the comment. I actually checked the pull request > > a little, but decided not to reply because I didn't want to be > > negative. I totally believe the current maintainer has a better format > > of PKGBUILD (well, except his pkgver mistake). Now let me comment a few > > things on SGE. > > > > In the SGE package comment. > > > > 1, The current maintainer blamed me "连pkgver都填错这个真的是有点不可容忍了". Google > > translation: "It’s really intolerable that even pkgver was filled in > > wrong." > > > > Now it turned out that the current maintainer made the mistake..... > > > > 2, He also said "通过.install在post install阶段装了一大堆包管理器没有接管的文件", Google > > translation "A lot of files that the package manager did not take over > > were installed in the post install stage through .install". > > > > This could be a disaster if somebody want to upgrade SGE by uninstall > > and re-install. SGE has been a very special software because it needs > > some post installation to let user specify a lot of host/jobs/queue > > configuration. Thus all files are put under /opt/sge for the legacy > > reason. > > > > > > Best, > > Manhong > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2020-10-14 at 18:58 +0400, Archange wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Le 14/10/2020 à 18:47, Manhong Dai via aur-general a écrit : > > > > 2, Force an AUR package maintainer to join AUR-general, or send > > > > every > > > > notification to the package maintainer, as I never received any > > > > email > > > > notification about orphaning SGE. > > > I’m not commenting on everything else here, but regarding this point: > > > subscription to aur-general is not required, and every notifications > > > are > > > sent to the package maintainer… or at least should be, because a bug > > > introduced some months ago broke that (see > > > https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/aurweb/-/merge_requests/6). > > > > > > So indeed you did not receive the Orphaning requests notifications. > > > But > > > you did receive comments on the AUR page, and you did receive the > > > emails > > > to which you responded and that told you to *stop top-posting*. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Bruno/Archange
Excellent use of top posting yourself, Alad. Cheers, -- Tom Swartz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature