On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:09:30AM +0200, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:57:03AM +0300, Alexander Epaneshnikov via > aur-general wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 08:37:23PM +0200, networkException via aur-general > > wrote: > > > Thank your for taking the time to reading, I hope it will be possible to > > > find a > > > way to submit ungoogled-chromium-bin properly. > > > > thank you for asking for advice. > > > > I also thought, why not move ungoogled-chromium to the community > > repository, if, of course, the inclusion criteria are met. > > I think this is also not a bad solution to the problem. > > Arch strives to deliver unpatched software. Packaging something like > ungoogled-chromium is antithetical to this goal, and I struggle to see why we > should make an exception for this package.
yes, it does sound logical. > (This is also from someone that looks at ungoogled-chromium as only a > performative thing, it doesn't actually get you anything in terms of security > nor privacy. Obviously someones opinion might differ :p) > > The current situation is clearly not ideal, and I don't see any good > solutions. > I'd maybe see if we can make an exception for ungoogled-chromium-bin as the > pragmatic option, thus allowing it to repackage .pkg.tar.zst. I personally do not mind, but as I said earlier, it is difficult for me to imagine an arch linux user who will not be able to add a repository. and of course the idea of repackaging the package is simply not pretty in my opinion. > -- > Morten Linderud > PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 -- Sincerely, Alexander | Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature