On Fri, 2021-12-17 at 00:17 +0100, Justin Kromlinger via aur-general wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 01:05:19 +0200 > silentnoodle via aur-general <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hey all, > > > > Today a package i co maintain (telegram-desktop-bin) was deleted because > > "Package exists in official community repo", but since we used prebuilt > > binary as source I did not think that would have applied. > > > > So guess I'd just like a word on what the first point in the rules of > > submission means: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission > > > > Cheers, Ben a.k.a silentnoodle > > So basically: > * telegram-desktop in community is git release 3.3.0 build by Arch Maintainers > * telegram-desktop-bin in AUR is git release 3.3.0 build by upstream > > For the end user, those two are basically the same package. Therefore the AUR > package is a > duplicate. >
No, they aren't. I haven't looked into the request but if this is indeed the case, the package was incorrectly deleted. Cheers, Filipe Laíns
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
