Hi Thomas, On 29/08/2022 15:34, Thomas via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > I have 2 questions: > > 1) when is it allowed and / or good practice to split multiple > packages by 1 PKGBUILD? > For example I have created a package which pulls 3 debian packages and > creates 3 Arch packages from it. > I want to do that in 1 PKGBUILD by package splitting. Is that a good > idea or should this avoided (if so why..)? Simple answer - when it makes sense. On the example you describe above I can't see a reason why 3 different packages (which would end up in 3 different packages in Arch Linux) would derive from one PKGBUILD. What's the reasoning for doing that instead of 3 different PKGBUILDs? > > 2) I found a bug in package splitting regarding the variable "pkgdesc" > - when in AUR: it simply gets ignored when used in package_<pkgname> > functions. > > Example: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-libs-git > -> Line 220: > https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=systemd-git#n220 > > It should work though according to: > https://archlinux.org/pacman/PKGBUILD.5.html#_package_splitting > > It seems to work when in the regular package database - which is using > the same PKGBUILD as the AUR ofc: > https://archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/systemd-libs/ > > -> Is this the right place to report an issue like that?
I had to decypher a bit on what you meant by bug but I think I got it. The pkgdesc field on split packages is ignored on the web ui and picking the first one (?) - right? If yes then please report as an issue at https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/aurweb/-/issues Cheers, Leonidas
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
