Robin Candau is probably telling the truth when he claims that the Arch
Team is "not lacking ideas".

The attacks are a real pain, but it seems the Arch Team is working on
it. I don't think it should go so far as to make the AUR as reliable as
official repositories, but right now I get the impression that's what's
expected.

If such large-scale attacks can be reduced in the future, everything
else can stay the same:

"Welcome to the AUR! Please read the AUR User Guidelines for more
information and the AUR Submission Guidelines if you want to contribute
a PKGBUILD. Contributed PKGBUILDs must conform to the Arch Packaging
Standards otherwise they will be deleted! Remember to vote for your
favourite packages! Some packages may be provided as binaries in
[extra].

DISCLAIMER: AUR packages are user produced content. Any use of the
provided files is at your own risk." - https://aur.archlinux.org/

Reply via email to