Thank you for the replies! I think "cq-csv" may work for my purpose. I just want to confirm the following: if the program can also be delivered as a library, which of the following names is more suitable for that package?
1. "libcq" (as intended by the author) 2. "libcq-csv" (to relate it to the main "cq-csv" program) 3. "cq-csv-lib" (breaks usual naming convention, but allows for concentrating into the same base package) Any comments or additional suggestions are welcome. Thank you again!
