jdarch [1] filed a request to merge softmaker-office-bin [2] into
softmaker-office-2012-bin [3]:

For users who want to stay at their version, or wish to install
multiple versions, it is more convenient to be able to use packages
with names dependent on their version. Therefore I would suggest
merging softmaker-office-bin into softmaker-office-2012-bin, and
future versions (e.g. 2016, 2020... wherever it may end) bear their
main version number in the package name.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jdarch/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/softmaker-office-bin/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/softmaker-office-2012-bin/

Reply via email to