On 01/30/17 at 11:15pm, Kieran Colford wrote:
> No one as expressed a valid reason for removal aside from an unclear
> purpose. I have corrected that now so it should be fine.

The package really serves no purpose just as the previous one. It will
only cause confusion since pacaur calls bauerbill, which is reason
enough for me to remove it.

-- 
Jelle van der Waa

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to