On 10/6/19 1:20 PM, Nephyrin Zey wrote: > On 10/6/19 9:28 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> Request #16196 has been accepted by polyzen [1]. >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/polyzen/ > > As was explained on the package, the first bits of ACO reaching upstream > mesa in no way means the ACO development branch is not relevant - much > like mesa being released doesn't mean a mesa-git package is irrelevant. > This was explained in the package comments, but apparently re-opening > deletion requests until accepted is what it takes. > > What is the right way to re-upload this package? Am I going to get > frowny-faces for just reinstating it?
It was incorrectly deleted, so just reupload it. I apologize that the comments and votes were lost. :( -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
