Hey Eric, Thanks for your reply. 1) The whole point of checks/test cases are to make sure that the package works correctly. If the whole point is to do --nocheck defeats the purpose of running testcases in the first place. 2) The whole point of asking to add a git flag is so that there can be a pypi version in the case this fails or for someone like me who would use it as a part of starlette and would need the stable release of pypi. 3)The first comment about failing assertion is at 2019-12-20 11:13 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pydantic/#comment-721472) hence I assumed that you were unavailable. Thanks and Regards
Tony Benoy I'd recommend you encrypt mails sent to me. You can find my pgp key at https://tinyurl.com/y9v2mrt9 On Mar 1 2020, at 9:19 am, Eric Berquist <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. Tests are not failing, and if they were, you could use `--nocheck`. > 2. Just because the package source comes from a release tarball put on GitHub > doesn't make it a `-git` version. > 3. Just because the maintainer doesn't respond after 5 days doesn't mean > they're unavailable. > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:09 PM <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > tonybenoy [1] filed an orphan request for python-pydantic [2]: > > > > The package is broken as tests is failing. Also the package is a git > > version and not from pypi. Also I have a package python-fastapi which > > is dependent on pydantic. I dont think the maintainer is avaliable. > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tonybenoy/ > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-pydantic/ > > >
