Disregard my previous message.  New maintainer repurposed package.
aur/crush now packages a different project.

@vcalv Consider closing the deletion request.

On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 1:23 PM xiota <[email protected]> wrote:

> Problem is caused by package using different pkgbase (crush) and pkgname
> (python-crush).  Should be deleted on basis that it is not useful.  Nothing
> depends on it.  There is no evidence of active users, with pkgstats
> dropping to zero late 2019.  Current maintainer has not pushed any change.
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 12:32 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> vcalv [1] filed a deletion request for crush [2]:
>>
>> I don't understand what's happening here.
>>
>> there is a `crush` project in aur git @
>>
>> ssh://[email protected]/crush.git
>>
>> That doesn't show up in any AUR pages.
>>
>> This is apparently a mistakenly/renamed uploaded package that should
>> have been `python-crush`
>>
>> But is preventing the upload of the source version of `crush-bin`
>> since any push to `crush` is denied.
>>
>> I'm requesting a deletion that should not be problematic since
>> effectively the package was never even alive.
>>
>> If merge is a better alternative, feel free to do that.
>>
>> It makes no sense that python-crush (which apparently exists) is
>> blocking the creation of the crush package.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vcalv/
>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/crush/
>
>

Reply via email to