> deceiving build of carapace-bin I do not think so. It follows [Go package guidelines](https:// wiki.archlinux.org/title/Go_package_guidelines) to build the completer `carapace`. The `carapace-bin` is a repack for pre-built binary from upstream. Do you think we need to use `carapace-bin` for this built-from-source one, we need `carapace-bin-bin` for the pre-built one? That sounds so strange.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
