Hi ! That's true, please disregard my request, I did not pay enough attention to this.
Sorry for the unnecessary noise, Vladimir Le jeu. 26 janv. 2023 à 10:18, Alex Palaistras <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > Though creating an entire package for a single symlink does seem rather > wasteful, there is one difference to `opendoas-sudo` -- `rofi` will > behave differently if `argv[0] == "dmenu"`; furthermore, the value of > this package isn't the symlink itself, it's the fact that this > `provides=("dmenu")`, and therefore will appease packages that depend on > `dmenu` when `rofi` is installed (which would, also, potentially > override any symlink the user has made in their `$HOME`). > > I don't see the point of deleting a package that has seen some use in > the community, but perhaps there's a bigger picture that I don't really > see here. > > Thanks, > Alex > > On 26/01/2023 07:55, [email protected] wrote: > > Erus_Iluvatar [1] filed a deletion request for rofi-dmenu [2]: > > > > Same reason as opendoas- > > sudo[https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- > > [email protected]/thread/7J2SRRVYQQGMKJCJCGGQVFWAX7XD3FBK/], > > we don't need a whole package for a symlink. > > > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Erus_Iluvatar/ > > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rofi-dmenu/ >
