May 27, 2023 16:32:31 Mark Wagie <[email protected]>:
> @serebit: It would help if you actually add it to the extra repo before > deleting it. > > Also, I do not appreciate you sloppifying the PKGBUILD and ignoring VCS > package guidelines for submodules. I spent a lot of time on this package > doing it right. > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email. > > ------- Original Message ------- > On Saturday, May 27th, 2023 at 1:55 PM, > [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Send Aur-requests mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or >> body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Aur-requests digest..."Today's Topics: >> >> 1. [PRQ#41615] Deletion Request for booth Accepted >> ([email protected]) >> 2. [PRQ#41412] Deletion Request for rstudio-bin Rejected >> ([email protected]) >> 3. [PRQ#41411] Orphan Request for owncast Accepted >> ([email protected]) >> 4. [PRQ#41674] Deletion Request for googleplay >> ([email protected]) >> 5. [PRQ#41675] Deletion Request for mangohud >> ([email protected]) >> 6. [PRQ#41675] Deletion Request for mangohud Accepted >> ([email protected]) >> 7. [PRQ#41676] Deletion Request for lib32-mangohud >> ([email protected]) >> _______________________________________________ >> Aur-requests mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Well it's not a VCS package anymore (so those guidelines don't apply) nor does it need to be one since upstream doesn't sign release tags/commits anyway. Why work harder to get the same code with no tangible benefit? The other changes were removing mostly redundant code. Probably the only change I disagree with is removing the provides arrays... - éclairevoyant
