>> >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wxwidgets-light [2]:
>> >
>> >Unmaintained since 2023-07-31, and currently several point releases
>> >older than repo's wxwidgets (3.2.2.1 vs 3.2.4).
>> >
>> >But this is also apparently unused, as no one flagged it.
>> >
>> >And it's not beneficial to keep. This package is not compatible with
>> >repo's wxwidgets-gtk3. and therefore most downstream dependent builds
>> >cannot use it, e.g. due to its divergent naming of the relevant wx-
>> >config executable.
>> >
>> >But no one complained - again, an evidence of disuse.
>> >
>> >This also cannot be coinstalled e.g. with repo's veracrypt (which I
>> >use).
>> >
>> >It also builds and puts the headless wxbase into wxwidgets-common-
>> >light - another divergence from repo's corresponding package, which
>> >does no such thing.
>> >
>> >Even if configured properly, this build would still break many reverse
>> >dependencies - those that need multimedia capabilities - as it omits
>> >gstreamer support.
>> >
>> >Therefore I don't see any benefit in keeping this. Maybe one person
>> >(submitter) would disagree, but no one else has shown any indication
>> >that they would needs this build.
>> >
>> >Enough to keep repo's wxwidgets (and AUR's wxwidgets-git).
>>
>
>Zero logs, user not proves what failed.
>
>of course not install with veracrypt because this package not provide any
>support to gstreamer, and is not the intention. if you want use veracrypt,
>use [extra] wxwidgets-foo
>
>greetings


I have have submitted all relevant problem points in my original filing.

Cheers

Reply via email to