On 23 March 2024 14:55:52 GMT+01:00, Oliver Bandel <oli...@first.in-berlin.de> wrote: >Quoting Marcell Meszaros <marcell.mesza...@runbox.eu> (snt: 2024-03-23 07:23 >+0100 CET) (rcv: 2024-03-23 07:23 +0100 CET): >> On 17 March 2024 13:22:23 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >> >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for any-dl [2]: >> > >> >ocamlnet is not compatible with ocaml5, so this package in turn is not >> >compatible with current Arch Linux. >> > >> >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >> >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/any-dl/ >> >> >> The last package change is ill-conceived. The build stays broken. >> >> A package cannot depend on both 'ocaml' (v5) and 'ocaml4', as they conflict >> with each other. Still not useful to keep this dead build. > >This package has problems because of ocamlnet not being available for >ocaml5. > >I asked the author of ocamlnet, if it was planned to update it for OCaml5. >The answer was yes. >So far there is no time plan for that, but next week I may habe more >information. >
It was asked from developer of ocamlnet more than one year ago (Fev 2023), and he didn't bother to answer. [a] Also there were work-in-progress were pull request commits submitted, but dev couldn't care less. And the submitting users admitted they are facing some difficulties and had hit a roadblock in making the patch work properly. [a]: https://gitlab.com/gerdstolpmann/lib-ocamlnet3/-/issues/27
