rubin55 [1] filed a deletion request for crc-bin [2]: I received a request for deletion for my package, openshift-codeready- bin. The reason given was that this package already exists prior to mine. I would like to offer a counter argument. My package is named more consistently with other openshift tools; crc-bin tells you nothing about the fact that it is openshift-specific. Furthermore, there are AUR packages for openshift-client-bin (which I based my naming on), and next to openshift-codeready-bin (for crc), I took the trouble to also package openshift-developer-bin (for odo) and openshift-pipelines-bin (for opc, tkn and tkn-pac). I think that from a user perspective, these names are more easily findable and the total set of openshift tools together on AUR being named consistently helps with that. If crc-bin would rename to openshift-codeready-bin (hence preserving the naming consistency with other openshift tools on AUR), I would not be opposed to merging/deleting/abandoning the package.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/rubin55/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/crc-bin/
