Le 25/11/2024 à 19:52, Marcell Meszaros a écrit :
On 25 November 2024 13:51:09 GMT+01:00, [email protected] wrote:
neitsab [1] filed a deletion request for primitive-git [2]:

Created in 2016 and never updated, user request in 2019 to use Go and
CVS packaging guidelines was never honored, (badly) duplicates already
existing https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/primitive (which we are
fixing after latest error report).

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/neitsab/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/primitive-git/
Please don't delete it. Upstream does not have any tagged release, and 
AUR/primitive is a VCS package in disguise, which should be merged into 
primitive-git (PRQ#66641) [1].

The '-git' pkgname suffix is mandatory. The package is now an orphan, which can 
be adopted and modernized.

[1]: 
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/4YXN4DCVNTKL7JULBO7RJK4N2H75Y4ZD

My idea was to get primitive-git deleted since:

- it's never been updated since its initial upload
- its PKGBUILD doesn't respect neither Go nor VCS packaging guidelines (as a commenter noted in... 2019)

and then get primitive renamed into primitive-git. Would that be okay with you? We're talking about a package whose upstream hasn't been touched since 2020 and with a grand total of respectively 1 and 4 votes for primitive-git and primitive, so I doubt it will be earth shattering to too many users.

Of course if we can merge primitive into primitive-git while keeping the PKGBUILD of the former (after it's hopefully fixed by its maintainer -- I posted a diff for it in its comments), all the better.

Reply via email to